XmasDVD
05-14-2008, 10:56 PM
from Docartz.com
The topic of the rather spry dead and imaginary people populating our Island and our living characters' lives has been much on people's minds lately, and more and more I found myself wondering why no one (or at least no one in Lost fandom I've been able to find) has mentioned Stanislaw Lem's brilliant novel (and Andrei Tarkovsky's critically-adored film), Solaris.
Let's have a look-see shall we? Solaris tells of a living planet (well, technically, a living "ocean" on a distant planet) which communicates with its human visitors by materially manifesting people from their pasts and forces them to confront their own limitations and foibles in the process. Sound familiar?
That the titular Solaris is an incomprehensibly alien sentience not necessarily advancing the best interests of its visitors as it attempts to communicate with them and understand them (while, in turn, the human scientists try to understand Solaris) also holds sounds a lot likeĀ Lost's Island.
As in Solaris, the Island's interactions with its human visitors and inhabitants cause insanity and death. Also, as in Solaris, the Island seems pretty indifferent to human suffering. It's been very willing to select the most traumatic possible "visitor" for those to whom it's manifested (Jack's father, Eko's brother, Ben's mother, Charlie for Hurley, Libby for Michael), has actively inflicted or allowed to occur various ailments (Ben's tumor, Jack's appendicitis, Locke's legs giving out at inopportune moments) and even "demanding sacrifice" (note that one of those inopportune moments for Locke's legs was what required Locke to send Boone to explore the Beechcraft, killing him).
None of which is to say that the Island is "evil" any more than Solaris was "evil"...they're both simply alien and have motivations incomprehensible to and arguably uncaring for humans. Or, to use Ben's colorful description from "Cabin Fever", they're (to human eyes) fickle bitches.
So, as usual, I would caution against taking too strong a "one-to-one" correlation. Lost is always, in the end, its own creature even if its genetic code contains DNA from a host of narrative ancestors. But I'll leave you with this thought: None of the other "mysterious islands" commonly considered antecedents for Lost's Island--Verne's The Mysterious Island, the island of Shakespeare's The Tempest (and the Forbidden Planet of film), Lemuria, Mu, Atlantis, and so on--were alive in and of themselves like Lost's Island and Solaris are.
The topic of the rather spry dead and imaginary people populating our Island and our living characters' lives has been much on people's minds lately, and more and more I found myself wondering why no one (or at least no one in Lost fandom I've been able to find) has mentioned Stanislaw Lem's brilliant novel (and Andrei Tarkovsky's critically-adored film), Solaris.
Let's have a look-see shall we? Solaris tells of a living planet (well, technically, a living "ocean" on a distant planet) which communicates with its human visitors by materially manifesting people from their pasts and forces them to confront their own limitations and foibles in the process. Sound familiar?
That the titular Solaris is an incomprehensibly alien sentience not necessarily advancing the best interests of its visitors as it attempts to communicate with them and understand them (while, in turn, the human scientists try to understand Solaris) also holds sounds a lot likeĀ Lost's Island.
As in Solaris, the Island's interactions with its human visitors and inhabitants cause insanity and death. Also, as in Solaris, the Island seems pretty indifferent to human suffering. It's been very willing to select the most traumatic possible "visitor" for those to whom it's manifested (Jack's father, Eko's brother, Ben's mother, Charlie for Hurley, Libby for Michael), has actively inflicted or allowed to occur various ailments (Ben's tumor, Jack's appendicitis, Locke's legs giving out at inopportune moments) and even "demanding sacrifice" (note that one of those inopportune moments for Locke's legs was what required Locke to send Boone to explore the Beechcraft, killing him).
None of which is to say that the Island is "evil" any more than Solaris was "evil"...they're both simply alien and have motivations incomprehensible to and arguably uncaring for humans. Or, to use Ben's colorful description from "Cabin Fever", they're (to human eyes) fickle bitches.
So, as usual, I would caution against taking too strong a "one-to-one" correlation. Lost is always, in the end, its own creature even if its genetic code contains DNA from a host of narrative ancestors. But I'll leave you with this thought: None of the other "mysterious islands" commonly considered antecedents for Lost's Island--Verne's The Mysterious Island, the island of Shakespeare's The Tempest (and the Forbidden Planet of film), Lemuria, Mu, Atlantis, and so on--were alive in and of themselves like Lost's Island and Solaris are.